original text vs. film

Carlos Atane V.S. Franz Kafka

Franz Kafka's original text of the metamorphosis demonstrates patriarchy after Gregor, the provider of the family, transforms into this insect, and is unable to work. The father is then forced to get a job to provide for his family and ensure that they survive. Not only did the patriarchal system have an effect on Gregor and his father, but from a feminist point of view it also had an impact on Grete and the mother. Whereas, Carlos Antane’s film of the metamorphosis manages to show the repression structure of how Gregor is treated and left unnoticed by his family because of his half human and half insect body. From a psychoanalytic point of view, Gregor Samsa starts to feel alienated from his family and humanity.

Patriarchy is a social system in which the male acts as the primary authority figure central to social organization, and where fathers hold authority over women, children, and property. It implies the institutions of male rule and privilege, and entails female subordination (Wikipedia). The Samsa's family shows a great deal of patriarchy. Gregor, the provider of the household has transformed into this unusual insect which restrains him from going to work and bringing home a paycheck. He shows no concern about his transformation, but he worries more about his job because without his job, his family is unstable. Gregor's father could've easily gotten a job before his son's metamorphosis, but instead he waits until Gregor is unable to work to find a job. “His father was a healthy, but old man, who had not worked now for five years…” (Kafka, 345).This is a great example that show how long Gregor’s father been depending on his son to provide for the family and how he is obligated to pay off his father’s debts. Gregor then realizes that his father was using him to pay bills for the household, but he also had money stashed away. Assuming his father used that extra money to pay off the debt he owed his director, so Gregor could quit his job, but that wasn’t the case. As you can see, Gregor did not like his job but he continued to still work because he was enslaved by his family. This is where Gregor notice how vicious is family is.

From a feminist point of view, the patriarchal system had an effect on Grete and the mother because as females they are suppose to be submissive to men, but in this case they are independent individuals. The men in this story are not forcing them to get a job to help provide for the family. Instead they decide to get a job on their own. Even though the mother, who suffered asthma, and his sister who is only seventeen, was still a child, manages to help around the house and get things done. They both had to do the cooking and cleaning around the house since they had to let the maid go. The impact of patriarchy was recognized when the women of the Samsa’s family succeeded in taking over positions of the men.

Atane’s film make out the bitterness Gregor’s family showed towards him. Grete’s ability to take care of him starts to decrease and she starts to get the impression that this insect is not her brother. She gets tired of taking care of her brother and the family feels the need to get rid of him. In the film, it was more of the father who showed a great deed of repression. He threw apples at Gregor, trying to kill him instead of scaring him back to his room. The father was angry throughout the entire film because Gregor was unable to provide for the family and he had to become the “man” of the house and find income. The repression continues after Gregor’s death. The family shows no type of grief once they saw his body laying their on the library floor. 

Repression of the bug v.s. human

Patriarchy imposes different feminine characteristics and stereotypes in the society today. This strengthens the wicked power relations between men and women. Grete and the mother relation to Gregor and the father went opposite directions in the film and the original text. Most men would’ve switched positions with Grete and the mother, and this shows the difference in the patriarchal system. Oppression is then built up in these women because of the lack of help from the men. The patriarchal system as a whole in Atane’s film and Kafka’s original text encourage men to do all of the work and the women to settle for what comes their way.

Works Cited

The Metamorphosis of Franz Kafka. Dir. Atanes, Carlos. 1992. film

Kafka, Franz. “The Metamorphosis.” Literature Fiction: Craft & Voice. Ed. Delbanco, Nicholas. New York, NY. 2010. (335-356). Print

Lupton, Greg. “The Metemorphosis.” Homepage. 29 May 2012. web

Sing, Rienna Lee. “Oppression in Kafka’s, “The Metamorphosis”. Universal Journal. web. 29 May 2012. 

Comparative Analysis

Storify

Kafka's The Metamorphosis

       Franz Kafka was known for writing stories with themes of isolation, oppression, and alienation. He is best known work includes the short story The Metamorphosis,in which the main character, Gregor Samsa, transform into a bug. This short story demonstrates how people are treated unfairly based on how they look or how they talk. Gregor faced different trials and ordeals. Unfortunately, he wasn't able to overcome them because he ends up dying in his room. He was different from his parents, sister, and the people he came in contact with on a daily basis.
       As I read the story I began to relate what I was reading to my own life. I know personally that I have caught myself laughing at others because of what they are wearing. In Gregor's case, before his metamorphosis, he was not only alienated at his job or his humanity, but also his family and his body. He didn't notice his transformation as bug because he never actually cared about his body. In fact, even his consideration for his family seems to be something alien to him. The protagonist which is Gregor faces a powerful indictment of alienation. Gregor's family was so use to him making all the money and supporting his family. He is enslaved by his family. They withdraw from him, but in the process they begin to change their lives around to provide for their family since Gregor can't. It's impossible to say Gregor overcame this alienation because he died at the end of the story. I would say the family received the reward for overcoming the metamorphosis of Gregor. A great weight has been lifted from the family.The family ends up moving out of the city into the countryside, and focus on finding Grete a husband.
       In a psychoanalytic interpretation, The Metamorphosis prevents the battle of the son and the father up close. (NYU School Of Medicine) As a result of his fathers failure, this only made Gregor stronger as an individual. Someone can only take so much pressure and they can't handle it anymore. The only escape Gregor ends up having from the isolation of his famy and the society was death.

This picture allows you to understand the transformation of the human into a bug, the metamorphosis.

Blake Comparative Analysis

Blake Comparative Analysis

My assignment was to select a poem and its companion plate from Song of Innocence to compare in my analysis. There is a strong religious theme in this poem which Blake uses the idea of sorrow to show how we deal with it in the perspective of God and humans. Whereas, he splits the poem, looking at how an infant, individual, and God deal with sorrow. I will be reviewing “On Another’s Sorrow by William Blake through a Psychoanalytic point of view. I will attempt to answer this question; what might a given interpretation of a literary work suggest about the psychological motives of the reader? Blake demonstrates the humans’ experience of sorrow and the infants’ experience of sorrow. While examining this complex poem, it seems to point out three different individual’s perception of sorrow; the innocent individual, the infant, and God response to sorrow. The speaker of this poem explains the psychological feeling of sorrow in the world. However, the speaker also believes that once you see another’s sorrow, then you should feel that same sorrow. In Blake's words, “ Can I see another's woe, / And not be in sorrow too? / Can I see another's grief, / And not seek for kind relief? ” This is a rhetorical question,which brings thoughts of how we cope with with sorrow. I agree to disagree with the speaker because you have sensitive people in the world that can care for others and put others before themselves, but there are also senseless people who only care about themselves. I can honestly say that I’ve been in both of these situations myself.



Today in the 21st century there is a lot of sorrow. Such as famine, economic condition, obesity, and other hardships which people tend to turn their backs on. The speaker asks, “And he who smiles on all / Hear the wren with sorrows small, / Hear the small bird’s grief and care / Hear the woes that infants bear.” The speaker is question Gods ability and position in the sorrows of humans. It also refers to a “wren” which is a very small bird. The small bird could possibly represent very small infants. The speaker is referring animals to humans, in other words they can react the same way in a psychological point of view. Blake’s certainty of the existence of sorrow in human beings is reflective of his views that the world is full of innocence and joy. Blake says in the last stanza, “O he gives to us his joy / That our grief he may destroy / Till our grief is fled and gone / He doth sit by us and moan.” The speaker not only questions God’s position in the sorrows of humans, but also provides its own views of God’s involvement in humans’ difficulties as well as his own views on religion. In the last stanza he mentions “he”, I believe he is referring to God. This is not a poem that concentrates on a plot, but rather, it focuses on Blake’s inquiry about the existence of sorrow from both the mortal and divine point of view. Blake is clearly very religious and his work seems to take on a propaganda towards religion.



William Blake’s “On Another’s Sorrow” is a thoughtful and intense poem about the understanding between human beings and as well as Gods sympathy. The most obvious of the poem are that humans have the ability to inherent sorrow for others and God has the power to feel sorrow for the entire world. Blake’s writing give the interpretation of different ideas, but here is what I thought what the text had read to me. It could also change the reader’s psychological motive to where they can think or feel something different than what speaker is saying.

  Works Cited

Blake, William. The Book of Thel, copy F, pl. 2. The William Blake Archive. Ed. Morris Eaves, Robert N. Essick, and Joseph Viscomi. 13 November 1997

May 15 midnight

I will be reviewing “On Another’s Sorrow by William Blake through a Psychoanalytic point of view. I will attempt to answer this question; what might a given interpretation of a literary work suggest about the psychological motives of the reader? Blake demonstrates the humans’ experience of sorrow and the infants’ experience of sorrow. While examining this complex poem, it seems to point out three different individual’s perception of sorrow; the innocent individual, the infant, and God response to sorrow. The speaker of this poem explains the psychological feeling of sorrow in the world. However, the speaker also believes that once you see another’s sorrow, then you should feel that same sorrow. I agree to disagree with the speaker because you have sensitive people in the world that can care for others and put others before themselves, but there are also senseless people who only care about themselves. I can honestly say that I’ve been in both of these situations myself.

Today in the 21^st century there is a lot of sorrow. Such as famine, economic condition, obesity, and other hardships which people tend to turn their backs on. The speaker asks, “And he who smiles on all / Hear the wren with sorrows small, / Hear the small bird’s grief and care / Hear the woes that infants bear.” The speaker is question Gods ability and position in the sorrows of humans. It also refers to a “wren” which is a very small bird. The small bird could possibly represent very small infants. The speaker is referring animals to humans, in other words they can react the same way in a psychological point of view.

 Blake’s certainty of the existence of sorrow in human beings is reflective of his views that the world is full of innocence and joy.  Blake says in the last stanza, “O he gives to us his joy / That our grief he may destroy / Till our grief is fled and gone / He doth sit by us and moan.” The speaker not only questions God’s position in the sorrows of humans, but also provides its own views of God’s involvement in humans’ difficulties as well as his own views on religion. In the last stanza he mentions “he”, I believe he is referring to God. This is not a poem that concentrates on a plot, but rather, it focuses on Blake’s inquiry about the existence of sorrow from both the mortal and divine point of view.

William Blake’s “On Another’s Sorrow” is a thoughtful and intense poem about the understanding between human beings and as well as Gods sympathy. The most obvious of the poem are that humans have the ability to inherent sorrow for others and God has the power to feel sorrow for the entire world. Blake’s writing give the interpretation of different ideas, but here is what I thought what the text had read to me. It could also change the reader’s psychological motive to where they can think or feel something different than what speaker is saying.

Psychoanalytic Criticism of William Blake's "On Another's Sorrow"

A TRUE Christian

Here's a video that I chose that describes my personality, most of all my faith. I would like to share this gospel song by Marvin Sapp called Never Would've Made It.

 

I chose this song because I am a strong believer. I am a Christian who believes in Jesus Christ. This song tells a lot about my religion and how much I cherish my religion. If you listen to the lyrics, you'll understand why I say this. I love this song, I listen to it at least four to five times a week. It reminds me that I never would have made it without our Lord Jesus Christ. Thank you Marvin Sapp for being a man of God that brings music that touches lives in such a positive way.